Terrorism and atomic weapons are both also very real risks any time nuclear energy is created. Terrorists who gain access to even one nuclear power plant can hold the entire world hostage, with the threat of a nuclear disaster. Every time a new nuclear power plant is built, it becomes one more location for terrorists to try and attack or control. Theft of nuclear material, including spent fuel rods and other materials that are considered radioactive waste, can allow anyone to make a dirty bomb, which is radioactive and extremely dangerous.

Nuclear power plants invite the question of whether or not we can live without them, but the real question should be whether we can live with nuclear energy. Nuclear power generation poses a number of dangers, not just to the earth but to the entire human population that resides on the earth as well. Nuclear power plants are extremely dangerous, for many different reasons, and nuclear power generation is not an answer to replacing fossil fuels. Nuclear energy does not help with climate change caused by fossil fuel use, nuclear power generation releases radioactive materials into the atmosphere, and these power plants are a target for terrorists and others intent on destruction. In addition, nuclear power plants pose enormous safety risks to the entire world. Chernobyl and Three Mile Island stand as examples of the extreme destructiveness that happens when nuclear power generation goes bad. Nuclear power plants costs enormous sums of money to develop and build, and nuclear power generation results in large amounts of radioactive waste, much of which will be deadly for hundreds and thousands of years. The production of atomic bombs and weapons is also a concern when nuclear energy is involved.

One single accident involving a nuclear power plant can cause many miles of destruction. Radioactive materials in the air can be spread by the wind, and the area around the power plant may be dangerous for an extremely long time. After all of the risks and benefits are weighed, the only conclusion that can be reached is that nuclear power plants are so dangerous that they are not a viable option, and nuclear energy costs much more than it provides. Nuclear power plants take years, many times decades, to study, plan, and build, and many times the result is negated by bad publicity, and area residents protesting and using community pressure to prevent the nuclear power plant from being built.

Nuclear power plants pose too many risks, and there is no safe way to create nuclear power. Nuclear energy does not help solve the problem of climate change, and nuclear energy can actually make the problem worse. Not only does nuclear power contribute to pollution by releasing radioactive materials in the air, this also takes funding away from safer renewable sources of energy. Even one meltdown could affect the entire country, possibly the world, and this is a risk that is too large to overlook. Radiation can affect humans for generations, as the atomic bombs used against Japan have shown. Using nuclear power plants places the entire planet at risk, for generations in the future.
Because radiation can not be seen, smelled, or detected without special equipment, nuclear power plants pose a very high risk to all communities, both local and global. Nuclear energy generation could end up being the cause of the destruction of the entire planet, and every living creature on it. Instead of focusing on nuclear energy, we need to spend our resources on alternative renewable energy sources like biomass energy, solar power, and wind energy instead.

5 Responses to “Nuclear Power Plants: Can We Live Without Them?”

1. 1
   Winston Peppers Says:
   

   i know i’m a little off topic, but i just wanted to say i love the layout of your blog. i’m new to the blogegine platform, so any suggestions on getting my blog looking nice would be appreciated.

   August 17th, 2010 at 10:08 am
2. 2
   Shena Kirson Says:
   

   Thank you for another fantastic blog. Where else could I get this kind of information written in such an incite full way? I have a project that I am just now working on, and I have been looking for such information¡­ Regards¡­

   July 23rd, 2010 at 5:06 pm
3. 3
   Josh Says:
   

   Can you please site some sources used in this article? Did you even research what happened at three Mile island?

   September 25th, 2009 at 3:20 pm
4. 4
   Matt Says:
   

   Chernobyl Was horrible I admit that but still if you do enough research on it you learn that it was the fault of the workers. They were trying to push the plant as far as they could and they had a meltdown, you can’t blame the plant for the stupidity of workers.

   May 22nd, 2009 at 10:07 am
5. 5
   Emmit Says:
   

   One word came to mind as I read this article: Chernobyl. There are a lot of pros and cons with nuclear energy, but honestly, revisit any Chernobyl website and you’ll probably decide it’s not worth it.

   January 22nd, 2009 at 6:23 pm

You Can Use This Form to Leave Your Feedback or Ask Additional Question

You must be logged in to post a comment.