Is Global Warming Fake?
Jul 16
1) Some statistics can be misleading or contrary to global warming:
Due to local climatic variations, some glaciers in Greenland and Antarctic ice have been shown in the last few years to be actually getting thicker, not thinner. All we ever hear about is the North Pole, but never about these other two important indicators of global warming.
NASA was once caught red-handed faking data about global warming. They simply took the temperature data for September and used this to give the official record of the temperature in October that year, and then claimed that October was the hottest year for decades.
2) We are being lied to for personal gain:
A few decades ago, back in the 70's, the same governments and scientists tried to scare us with stories of the impending ice age, and now we are supposed to listen to similar false fears.
Many companies made a lot of money from the ozone layer scam. This has also since proven to be false, but the media which gave us a big scare at the time has since remained silent.
Everyone knows that big scares always mean big profits for government connected companies. For instance, GE owns NBC, which is brainwashing us with constant global warming stories. However, GE makes a huge profit from the sale of green products such as windmills and solar panels to governments.
3) Natural factors are much more important than man-made factors in realising CO2 into the atmosphere:
The ocean and volcanoes are much bigger sources of CO2 and other such greenhouse gases than humans. If the CO2 count is increasing, the influence of man may be minimal.
The global warming is fake movement is a healthy one it always pays to be sceptical about what scientists and governments tell you. However, on this one I believe that the global warming sceptics who are looking for proof that global warming is fake have been misguided, and by forces which are much stronger than GE or any such alternative energy company.
The "global warming is fake" sceptics themselves are subject to propaganda from the most powerful companies in the world: the oil companies, for whom the global warming debate is a matter of survival. These oil companies have extremely strong ties to the government and the press in the US, and for this reason the US is the home of the global warming sceptic.
For more info on global warming go to:
wikipedia
globalwarming.org
Related Posts
- New Study Pinpoints Amount of Glacier Melt Caused by Humans
- Could Rising Temperatures Endanger the World’s Crops?
- But Size Doesn’t Matter: How we’re Shrinking in the Heat
- Environmental Board Games: Rescuing Polar Bears From the Perils of Melting Ice
- The Impact of Global Warming on Forests
9 Responses to “Is Global Warming Fake?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I don’t usually reply to posts but I will in this case, great info…I will bookmark your site. Keep up the good work!
September 6th, 2010 at 2:37 amI have been searching temporarly for that smart study with regard to this niche . Browsing in Yahoo I finally encountered this web site. Seeing this info So i am seriously happy to enunciate that I get a positive feeling I found whatever I was looking for. For certain i will make certain to remember this web site and take a look consistently.
September 5th, 2010 at 5:46 pmThank you for sharing this,i hope you will share so much information in the future.
September 5th, 2010 at 10:42 amPretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed browsing your blog posts. In any case I¡¯ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again soon!
September 4th, 2010 at 3:32 amNice post! I think my comments form need some new design too!
August 27th, 2010 at 4:12 pmGreat Article – we are hopefully going to notice greater things happening in our area soon
August 26th, 2010 at 7:46 pmThanks for your posting, i am just a newbie in the internet business, need to learn a lot from the gurus
August 25th, 2010 at 5:54 amit’s great,thank you for your share.
August 17th, 2010 at 5:23 pmSorry, but I don’t agree with you here. I don’t like that approach. But it’s a good start off. Perhaps with some increased information I could manage to understand it even more?
August 17th, 2010 at 5:18 pm