
Hi! I, Michael Stern, a.k.a. Mr.Bionomic, chief editor of BionomicFuel.com welcome you at our website, an informational web portal to the world of green energy, renewable fuel and alternative investment options. Browse our website to learn everything you wanted to know about the world of green energy. Feel free to leave your comments – we want to hear from you!












"Hi! I, Michael Stern, a.k.a. Mr.Bionomic,
chief editor of BionomicFuel.com welcome you at our website, an informational web portal
to the world of green energy, renewable fuel and alternative investment options.
Browse our website to learn everything you wanted to know about
the world of green energy.

Never heard of this before, but thanks for opening up my eyes.
August 19th, 2010 at 12:28 amt’s such a important site. fanciful, extraordinarily interesting!!!
———–
Gry online
August 17th, 2010 at 3:35 pmWe have spent over $2.2 billion dollars on algae research for the last 35 years and nothing to show for it. Algae has been researched to death at universities for the last 50 years in the US. The problem is as long as the algae researchers can say we are 3-5 years away, its too expensive and they need more research they get the grant money. Nothing will ever get commercialized at the university level.
The question you need to be asking is ” Does the US really want to get off of foreign oil or do we want to continue to fund the algae researchers at the universities.”
Investigative reporting needed on algae research
We encourage you strongly to do some investigative work and see how much money has been received in algae related research grants and nothing has been commercialized to date. Look at the massive amounts given to universities for research nationwide vs. no monies given for real algae production companies in the US.
We need money going into algae oil production and stop wasting money on research. Algae researchers are incapable of commercializing anything!
December 14th, 2009 at 12:56 pmThanks for such an informative website, Mr. Stern.
A quick question: if you had to choose between incorporating either a city-wide recycling program or a city-wide trash to energy plant, which one would you consider to be more environmentally friendly?
I appreciate your time!
November 28th, 2009 at 1:33 amGinger Fast
Mr. Stern: I am working on a geography textbook program and would like to use an image of garbage in the Pacific that is on your site. How would I go about doing that?
Maureen S Raymond
November 22nd, 2009 at 11:05 amWhy did I so strongly insist on the quantum-mechanical periods the point of view, though I could not really make it clear in this little book and may well have bored many a reader?
October 22nd, 2009 at 7:07 amHello Mr. Stern my name is Dr. Khoopis Yung and I am doing a research project on the pros and cons of global warming and need to know the author of this website and the author’s expertise. I am assuming that you are the author but I am not completely sure. Please write back as soon as possible. Thank you for your assistance in my project and have a great day!
October 6th, 2009 at 10:55 amCO2 absorption – algae
We are experts in designing greenhouses for CO2 and production of algae.
We are carrying out projects of 1,000 hectares.
The costs are lower than traditional light and Transmit is greater.
We feedstock CO2 in enormous quantities.
The realization depends on the ability of governments and if realization of effort obtaining benefits and producing huge amounts of algae for the extraction of oil and food for animals and humans.
Budgets are given privately to governments and public services.
Five tons of CO2 will be used to produce a 1 algae.
The advantage is that our system is watertight and does not pollute the atmosphere as with traditional greenhouses.
If they can not answer this lead mail to the appropriate authority to be evaluated and answered correctly.
Best regards
September 27th, 2009 at 12:41 pmEduadro Garcia
Industrial Mechanical Technician
I am an Ethiopian Researcher and currently MSc student studying in my country. I wanna get in touch with grant providers on Biofuel cropping investment in large scale or share work if they can provide the finance. I have flenty of suitable land, crop varieties or species and Skilled manpower to manage the field and post harvest handeling. If any one intersted we can have a deal, please keep in touch.
September 23rd, 2009 at 12:19 pmMr. Stern,
In your article about Sustainable Power Corp, you quote the $.50 cent cost to produce diesel fuel using the Rivera process. Are you aware that the SEC is charging Mr. Rivera with fraud in misrepresentation of the facts and his process. If anyone can disprove the SEC, I sure would like to hear about it.
August 10th, 2009 at 2:34 pmanswer me
July 29th, 2009 at 2:46 amhow effective is biomass energy
July 29th, 2009 at 2:46 amI am an Ethiopian Researcher and currently MSc student studying in my country. I wanna get in touch with grant providers on Biofuel cropping investment in large scale or share work if they can provide the finance. I have flenty of suitable land, crop varieties or species and Skilled manpower to manage the field and post harvest handeling. If any one intersted we can have a deal, please keep in touch.
July 28th, 2009 at 3:19 pmGood morning sir, i find your website very interesting.
July 28th, 2009 at 6:01 amI need some assitance.
I am a masters student in Germany currently doing a research on Biofuel Certification. would be pleased if you can throw more light on this issue and if possible give me other contacts from whom I could get more information.Also if you have an idea of already existing and implmented certification scheme, i will grateful to get the materials.Thanks
Your website page, “The Pros and Cons of a Waste Vegetable Oil Economy” makes a patently false assertion. The quote, “American restaurants throw out billions of gallons of cooking oil every year, which would become fuel in a vegetable oil economy, resulting in significantly less landfill waste.” is absolutely false. Waste cooking oil has been collected and recycled at a nearly 100% rate since the 1950′s. This material has been used for many purposes; chief among them as a source of energy in production livestock diets. Should you take this source of energy from it’s current use and be successful in burning it as fuel, the net affect will be the same. More acres used to produce more oil to meet the current demand.
Further, this material has not entered landfills in decades. However, biofuel production creates glycerin that contains high levels of methanol and methyl-hydroxide, fat-laden wastewater that causes problems in municipal water treatment plants, and waste solids that do, in fact, go to the landfill. By comparision, bio-fuel production uses significantly MORE landfill space with greater environmental impact than current uses of waste cooking oil.
I’ll go even further for you – there is no need of bio-diesel, the favored green fuel of the day. Rudolph Diesel invented the diesel engine to run on vegetable oil. No additional processing is required. There are a number of companies currently marketing systems that allow diesel engines to run on vegetable oil that is not processed. This might actually match the current use of waste vegetable oil in terms of no landfill disposal. However, the same arguements apply: it takes a product currently fully used and converts it to an alternative use. Thus, the food chain continues to be converted to fuel. Thus the current users will have to pay higher prices and expand crop production to meet current food needs.
June 28th, 2009 at 10:36 pmThere are many interesting ideas on here, and the concept of investment in green energy is great. In fact looking for ways I could invest small sums of money in alternative energy is how I found this site. I fear though after reading several articles and comments that there is a serious problem. This is an OPINION website, and many people are using it as a research source. There are almost no references to true substantiating evidence or studies. While I’m glad others are trying to collaborate to further investment in green energy, it seems disjointed. It seems as if there are a number of people grasping at straws to try to get anyone to invest in what are indeed “pie in the sky” ideas that seem wonderful because they are themselves in the middle of them.
A note to all who read this site if you wade through all the talk on here to actually read this post: Please read everything on here with a healthy pessimism. Take the good and leave the silly. And don’t use this site as a research reference!
June 25th, 2009 at 2:38 pmHello Mr. Stern,
I have find your information to be so informative and interesting!
Please know that my company is working with lenders who are actively looking for good green energy projects in which to fund.
Please forward on my email to anybody in need of funding.
thank you!
June 21st, 2009 at 2:39 pmMichelle Maltese
hi. i have a research about renewable energy, im looking for the
1. Top 20 States , Top 10 Countries, Top 10 Cities in U.S. using renewable energy.
2. 50 Private Sector in U.S. engaged in renewable energy projects.
3. Government Regulatory involved in renewable energy.
4. Countries in U.S. to invest renewable energy.
How I wish you could help me. Thank you so much.
May 21st, 2009 at 2:36 pmThis website really helped me a lot in my project on geothermal energy. Thank you very much, Mr. Bionomic.
May 21st, 2009 at 3:45 amIs there a forum to list a brief prospectus. We are planting the largest Miscanthus planting in America. It will be 20,000 acres in 2010.
April 21st, 2009 at 11:33 pmI am student in the UK and came across some of our stuff whilst browsing for titles about pollution. It is a good job you are doing and I appreciate the notes you have written. On the other hand there are some things I will pose an argument about, when you were talking about the nuclear you said it should not be considered for alternative energy. I will argue with that by saying from its waste we could power a country for about 10 to 20 years. Agree?
April 16th, 2009 at 8:57 amDear Michael Stern,
You have a great website, (Bionomic BRILLIANT NAME!!) Would like to help us both earn profits more easily, and help the envirionment. This would be a very smart way.
Help me gather names, emails and phone numbers of people interested in investing in startup wind turbine electricity company.
Latest technology – 300 ft high vertical fan turbine floating on magnetic levitation, reducing friction on moving parts to 0,
100 acre operation, (as opposed to 64,000 acre one using conventional wind generators) produces enough electricity to power 750,000 houses.
Highly accredited team of engineers, and high ranking military officers
By California Law, Public Utilities Companies must comply with a renewable portfolio standard of 20%-No waiver for non compliance
140,000 production facility near Edwards Airforce Base being built
2 plants coming on line in next few months
What do people pay for electricity each monthl? Let’s say 750,000 homes at $150 a month average. That’s $112,500,000 per month X 12= 1.35 BILLION PER YEAR
I will pay you high fees for introducing me to investor prospects on this type of venture.
Let’s collaborate together please.
Thank you for your consideration.
Jovan Damjanac
April 10th, 2009 at 3:20 amBio Global Resources Inc.
Hello
March 28th, 2009 at 6:58 amI am student in Mongolia. I seek information about if spills petroleum, how soil pollution restore. help me please
Your Excellency
March 25th, 2009 at 6:19 amI would like to introduce myself; I am an Egyptian researcher working as an assistant lecturer in Faculty of Engineering at Mattaria, University of Helwan, Cairo, Egypt. And also, I am a mechanical consultant of APS Tekenburo B.V.
I had started a research programme at 1995 that was concerning about synthesizing bio-fuels from jojoba raw oil. At 2003 there were two types of bio-fuels were synthesized from jojoba raw oil in the laboratory. The first one is novel volatile that is suitable for fueling the spark ignition engines. Such fuel can be termed as jojoba bio-gasoline while, the second one is suitable for fueling the compression ignition engines. That can be termed as jojoba bio-diesel.
Knowing that, the novel jojoba bio-gasoline is not known worldwide.
Noting that, the jojoba bio-gasoline can be used as missiles fuel or fuel additive.
The jojoba bio-gasoline will be ready to be applicable by the end of 2008 by publishing the Ph.D thesis under the title “Performance, Abnormal Combustion and Emissions of Jojoba Bio-Gasoline and its Blends with Gasoline in Spark Ignition Engines”.
While the bi-product can be termed as waxy cream from synthesizing of the two types of bio-fuels are about 20% of the total amounts of reactants can be used in cosmetic industries and was successfully tested by local and commercial hair care centers.
Thus, I will be thankful if your Excellency directs us to the proper way of investing these novel and promising fuels and other products for mutual benefits.
Therefore the business plan can be divided into five parts to achieve the maximum benefits there are:-
1- Preparation and plantation of 10,000 acre of desert land with jojoba shrubs. (the time period until first production is 3-4 years).
2- Construction of an oil extractor of jojoba seeds that can be purchased from the market (recent price is 250 USD per metric ton) until starting of production of jojoba seeds from planted land (the time period starts by the start of the project).
3- Construction of a synthesizing plant of the jojoba oil (purchased until production from planted land) in order to produce jojoba bio-diesel, jojoba bio-gasoline and waxy cream (the time period starts by the start of the project).
4- Construction of a fermentation plant that produces alcohols using the residuals from oil extraction as biomass (the time period starts by the start of the project).
5- Marketing plan of the different products in several markets such as the bio-fuels market for the jojoba bio-diesel, the missiles liquid fuels markets for the jojoba bio-gasoline or the fuels additives markets for the same product, the cosmetics markets for the jojoba waxy cream and the Markets of alcohols for the produced alcohol (that I have already started).
From that, I would like to send a more detailed report about the different products from the jojoba seeds if Your Excellency interested in cooperation between us.
I am looking for hearing very soon from you.
Osayed S.M. Abu-Elyazeed
Assistant Lecturer
Faculty of Engineering, Mattaria
Cairo, Egypt.
I am working with a community group interested in implementing a biowaste(leaves,woodchips,manure) to energy system at our landfill/recycling center. We are looking to purshase equipment/expertise to develop such a systen for our
March 13th, 2009 at 8:10 pmmaterials & conditions. Can anyone provide names of manufacturers/distributors ? Thanks
I’m looking for documented emissions data for burning WVO in cars, generators, or boilers. Thanks
March 6th, 2009 at 12:20 pmCan you tell me what source you’re using for emissions data in below posting dated Nov 6th 2008? I’m interested because I’m trying to build a case for WVO use in Vermont and the state wants me to find data. Thanks!
What is the future of WVO? WVO is waste vegetable oil, and most of us have seen commercials or articles showing vehicles that can run on waste vegetable oil, which is the same oil that is used for cooking. Diesel engines can usually run on WVO, many times with little or no modifications needed to the engine. The first diesel engine was created by Rudolf Diesel. As a fuel, Diesel used peanut oil, which was in abundance at the time. That means that the first diesel engine was a vegetable oil engine, and this is why few or no modifications are needed for many diesel engines to run on WVO.
There are critics who say that the WVO vehicles could not possibly become common, due to the high costs of vegetable oils and the substantial amounts of vegetable oil that would be needed if all the cars in the country, or the world, were converted to burn WVO. Most researchers and analysts say that the capability exists today to allow 5 percent of all vehicles to run on WVO without having to produce any more vegetable oil. This is taking into account the amount of WVO that is disposed of by restaurants and other businesses that use it. In the United States alone, 4.5 billion gallons of WVO are produced, and many of these gallons end up costing restaurants to dispose of them. Vehicles that can run on WVO would have a source of free fuel, and restaurants could get rid of this waste at no cost. Both sides would win. WVO is also much more environmentally friendly than gasoline or diesel, and carbon emissions would be significantly reduced.
WVO produces slightly less harmful emissions than biodiesel, and is significantly more efficient than regular diesel or gasoline. WVO is a biofuel, and these fuels are neutral when it comes to carbon dioxide because the plants grown to produce biomass materials absorb carbon dioxide from the environment. The little carbon emissions that are released by them are offset by the amount absorbed, thus they are neutral.
Biodiesel Process
Sulfur dioxide and sulfate emissions do not occur with WVO like they do in fossil fuels, and these emissions are what cause acid rain. WVO contains no sulfur at all, so these emissions are eliminated. Carbon monoxide emissions are also lowered with the use of WVO, and by as much as 60 percent, and the carcinogens present in gasoline emissions are reduced by 90 percent with WVO. WVO emissions contain 45 percent fewer particulates, components have been proven to increase the cases of asthma by as much as 50 percent. Using WVO instead of gasoline or diesel will lower hydrocarbon emissions by 50 percent as well, and this has a beneficial effect on the atmosphere, especially in places like California and others where smog from emissions and pollution has become a big problem.
WVO as a biofuel can play an important part in the future of energy. There will probably never be a time when WVO is the main source of energy for the United States and/or the world, but this technology can play an important role. The future of energy for the world will probably not rest on one single alternative renewable energy source, but instead use a combination of many different sources, including WVO. This biofuel may help reduce dependence on fossil fuels by 5 percent, while another renewable source may provide another 10 percent and a third source providing more. Using all available renewable sources of bioenergy, including WVO, will eliminate dependence on fossil fuels and reduce damage being done to the planet.
March 6th, 2009 at 12:18 pmDear D. Phillips Wells,
We will forward your ideas and contact information to interested parties.
But for the sake of knowledge for any visitor on our website, could you please explain to “average Joe” what is the real advantage of your method in simple terms?
I mean this: right now an average price for diesel fuel is still around $2.40 per gallon. According to your theory, and correct me if I am wrong, cost of diesel for your hypothetical community of 30,000 households, assuming they use 1/2 gallon of diesel a day, will be $30,000 a day and your system will be 30 times cheaper. Doing reverse calculation that means diesel price per gallon will be $2.40/60 = 4 cents per gallon. Hmm…It could be a breakthrough, or it could be another unrealistic theory…
And prospective investors would love to hear about numbers, too.
Regards,
January 30th, 2009 at 11:03 amMr. Bionomic
We have developed a new technology to generate electricity. It uses no carbon-based or radioactive fuels – nor is it one of the "Al Gore Fantasies" such as solar, wind, geothermal, or other unreliable and often very expensive alternatives being pushed.
With our system generation occurs in "plants" as with other familiar systems. The difference is that our system is very "clean" and, in fact, has only two "waste streams". One is oxygen, which can just be vented to improve air quality or, I would presume, could be captured if there's a need for it. The other is organic carbon – this, of course, is the best "food" for algae-based biofuel operations so I expect many plants will either add downstream biofuel "farms" or sell the carbon to existing ones. (Much depends on the climate where the plant is located.)
The plants are very safe and would require a minimal staff to be on hand – I think that in many cases several plants could be monitored by a central "command center". In a "worst case scenario" things would just stop – no fires, no explosions, etc. No one in the area has to jump out of bed at 3:00 a.m. and run for dear life.
The "big story" is the cost. We had a study conducted which projected fuel costs of a diesel fuel operated plant to serve a hypothetical community of 30,000-40,000 homes and compared that with costs using our system. Running at full capacity, diesel would be about $30,000.00 a day compared with our system which would be less than $1,000.00. In addition, of course, there are additives and other expenses associated with burning diesel and, always, a variety of environmental concerns. So, unlike many of the many new technologies being promoted, this is the one which not only offers the benefits everyone wants, but also brings significant economies over current systems.
Our plan is to find a "development partner" so we can fund the essential steps to prove and protect the technology and then we want to license it very inexpensively throughout the world. Our problem is getting even minimal funding to move this forward. (Hint: the government does nothing to help….)
January 29th, 2009 at 12:48 pmHi I am Rohit Gujral T.Y degree student of hotel management i required your help 2 do my reserch project on “GLOBAL WARMING THE BIGGEST DESASTER”will u help me can i know your any green energy plant in Mumbai.
January 29th, 2009 at 10:15 am