
Sustainable Power Corp (SSTP), to discover a means to produce a cost efficient biofuel, a goal not previously realized by any other biofuel producers. In fact, the cost for producing one gallon of biofuel from crops like corn or soybeans is about $2.10 per gallon, and the amount of biofuel that can be produced from 1 ton of a particular food crop is about 70 to 80 gallons. Simple math shows that this does not provide significant advantage for the consumer. It must also be considered that potentially hazardous consequences of turning to a food-based energy alternative. Of course here we're talking about food prices. A recent report from the World Bank showed that the production of biofuels made from food crops has increased the cost of foods by 75 percent in local markets. This is contrary to the original estimate, which read that the increase in food costs by producing biofuels would not increase by more than 3 percent. Because of this implication, it would seem unwise to continue on with this line of technology.
The key to making biofuels the solution to world energy needs lies in using waste crops and unusable portions of food crops as source material. This technology, but a dream just several years ago, now exists and has been proven successful. This process is far more economical and can be done at a price per gallon of 50 cents, more than 75 percent less than the cost per gallon of biofuels produced from food crops. SSTP's technology puts no strain on food resources. This fact cannot be overstated. With a burgeoning population, the premise of food shortages and or an inability of people to afford adequate food looms. This technology could actually improve the situation since costs to transport the fuel would be slashed. The value to all countries, especially the Third World, is invaluable. SSTP can produce 200 gallons of fuel oil from one ton of crop waste, almost three times more than the conversion ratio of food crops to fuel.

Vertroleum® is created through "chemical hydrolysis with a modified pyrolysis and the use of nano bacteria." This is called the "Rivera Process." It contains the same hydrocarbons as crude oil, a mixture of hydrocarbons C-5 pentane thru C-20 eicosane. When used in the same distillation process employed by petroleum companies, Vertroleum can be further refined to produce a biogasoline (BG-100), a substitute for gasoline E85 in flexible-fuel vehicles, biokerosene (jet fuel), a diesel blendstock naptha (an octane enhancer), heating fuel, refined diesel, tars and plastics. The company's biocrude oil can also be refined into 69 other renewable fuels or chemical materials as certified by AmSpec. In addition, AmSpec verified that most of the bio-crude "cuts" meet or exceed ASTM standards for petroleum products using the standard additives for the industry whereby the product doesn't need tier testing.
SSTP is now looking at expansion by placing factories in Central America, Sweden, and the U.S. Pacific Northwest. SSTP is looking for potential partners to facilitate growth both domestically and abroad. Equally important though, it would like to be able to offer the potential of placing processing plants throughout third world countries on a global scale. Even one fully operational SSTP factory in a depressed country could make a significant difference to the economy and standard of living there.

Once a facility is approved for construction in a particular country, SSTP will provide its own staff on location to coordinate and monitor the entire building process. This includes planning, site selection, procurement of materials, quality and assurance testing prior to launch, training of local people as employees, and on-site management for a minimum of six months after the initial launch. Thereafter, a representative of SSTP will visit the facility at least once a year. This visit is to assure continued peak operation as well as to continue to engender good will between SSTP and the management and staff operating the facility. Also, prior to the initial launch and annually thereafter, SSTP will provide its proprietary catalyst to the plant. This catalyst is the essential component required to for the plant to successfully process waste crops and municipal waste into biofuel.
Related Posts
- Who Tops the State Energy Efficiency Scoreboard?
- Rivera Process from Sustainable Power Corp: How It Can Benefit for Energy from Waste Conversion?
- Green Jet Fuel Can Be Produced by Sustainable Power Corp
- Sustainable Power Corp. Claims that Fossil Fuels Won't Be Needed for Electricity Generation
- Sustainable Power Corp Produces Biogas that Can Be Used in Gas Turbine Generators













"Hi! I, Michael Stern, a.k.a. Mr.Bionomic,
chief editor of BionomicFuel.com welcome you at our website, an informational web portal
to the world of green energy, renewable fuel and alternative investment options.
Browse our website to learn everything you wanted to know about
the world of green energy.

Thanks for your article about SSTP can't work out the maths to get the profit you state Quote;When a typical factory reaches full capacity, it will be able to produce 3 million gallons of fuel oil per day. The annual realized profit from this production is estimated to be between $12 and $14 billion (U.S.). ------------------------------------------------------------ Did you miss out a decimal point $ 1.2 billion and $ 1.4 billion. other wise it seems more than rather high can't get income before profit anyway near your figure. Would be more than nice if it is possible. Any chance of the maths on this one please? Respectfully g.low
January 8, 2009 at 13:32 pmThe basis for these estimates is over-come-by-events (OBE). There used to be a 400 Reactor concept producing Vertroleum(R), an artificial crude oil, where 48 Reactors were dedicated as fuel to power generators capable of about 523 MW of electricity. The remaining Vertroleum(R) from 352 Reactors (7,000 gallons per reactor per day) would be distributed by Envirocompanies, Inc. The plan used to be that Enviro would distill the "bio oil" into motor fuel products: Biogasoline, BioJet Fuel, an alternative Diesel, Marine Fuel, etc. The focus now apparently to only produce electricity using the Reactor "gas" output that is similar to Natural Gas as fuel to a gas turbine. In a combined cycle mode integrated with steam turbines, the Green Power Plant could sustain about 540 MW of electrical power to all the equipment at Baytown, and the residual pushed to the local power grid. A Senate bill offers a significant tax credit based on Million BTUs produced. It probably would cover all the labor costs. Then there is an "alleged agreement" that would pay SSTP $35/ton just to get rid of the MSW. All totalled, a Green Power Plant might approach $1 Billion/year in revenues. ###### But little attention is now given to Vertroleum(R), the artificial crude oil. Weird Science is also ignoring all the R&D on non-food biomass to produce it, and instead shift to MSW because it was the last biomass demonstration to be conducted at Baytown. Seems a bit off center to ignore production of the artificial crude oil even if it meant selling designs and licenses to other interested parties that are not interested in being saddled with a $1-2 Billion Green Power Plant that can only generate 540 MW. ###### What is now missing is the Vision on how many Reactors are needed to sustain an adequate supply of "gas" or "Vertroleum(R)" for a dual fuel turbine (perhaps Siemens). The 48 Reactors out of 400 Reactors was alleged to be for Dual Fuel Power Generators, perhaps like those tested with Vertroleum(R) after TPS made modifications. Basically the Public has no real idea what the Baytown, Tx design baseline is TODAY, and the same applies for any other location in or out of the USA. Frankly, the indications are that USSE/SSTP is flat broke and lacks any financing support. I'm tossing in L.Sole and Pemco in the mix. L.Sole has done nothing based on the lack of "progress and results". STILL NO REVENUES STILL NO CONSTRUCTION STILL NO PROGRESS
February 6, 2009 at 19:14 pmI am very interested in when major construction starts in Baytown. Watching hundreds of reactors being assembled will be a sight to see. I am sure SSTP management knows the exact amount to build to completed the project. Engineers plan these projects completely before construction begins. I hope the project is fully visible to the public, news, pictures, visits, etc...
February 15, 2009 at 22:26 pmIt's all a fluke... google these companies and this John Rivera. He got charged with litigation by the SEC and that's all they continue to do. Make up these hoax press releases and then try and get people to invest in their going nowhere company making them money. Do the research and you'll see...
February 26, 2009 at 18:05 pmSEC press litigation: http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2008/lr20648.htm
March 17, 2009 at 23:02 pm