<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pros and Cons of Nuclear Power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bionomicfuel.com/pros-and-cons-of-nuclear-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bionomicfuel.com/pros-and-cons-of-nuclear-power/</link>
	<description>Green energy investments and news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:58:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.bionomicfuel.com/pros-and-cons-of-nuclear-power/#comment-17845</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 09:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-17845</guid>
		<description>How do you think this will continue or be affected in the next 5 years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you think this will continue or be affected in the next 5 years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MBA Templates</title>
		<link>http://www.bionomicfuel.com/pros-and-cons-of-nuclear-power/#comment-16133</link>
		<dc:creator>MBA Templates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-16133</guid>
		<description>Wonderfully engaging article that is right to the point with a lot of great suggestions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderfully engaging article that is right to the point with a lot of great suggestions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zhangwen</title>
		<link>http://www.bionomicfuel.com/pros-and-cons-of-nuclear-power/#comment-15529</link>
		<dc:creator>zhangwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-15529</guid>
		<description>we should take care of our earth,O(∩_∩)O~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we should take care of our earth,O(∩_∩)O~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: free sex chat</title>
		<link>http://www.bionomicfuel.com/pros-and-cons-of-nuclear-power/#comment-11799</link>
		<dc:creator>free sex chat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-11799</guid>
		<description>thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aiden Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.bionomicfuel.com/pros-and-cons-of-nuclear-power/#comment-8937</link>
		<dc:creator>Aiden Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8937</guid>
		<description>Sound good. Its also my favorite topic.That’s great andthanks for the fine sharring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sound good. Its also my favorite topic.That’s great andthanks for the fine sharring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.bionomicfuel.com/pros-and-cons-of-nuclear-power/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-630</guid>
		<description>George Washington, the world will NOT end in 2012, the sun has enough fuel to keep burning for thousands of years to come. No one has to worry about the 2012. What we need to worry about is fiding a way to power things that isnt dangerous and everyone can afford. Nuclear power will work for now but hopefully someone will find out how to make everything solar powered and replacee things that pollute and hurt the enviroment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Washington, the world will NOT end in 2012, the sun has enough fuel to keep burning for thousands of years to come. No one has to worry about the 2012. What we need to worry about is fiding a way to power things that isnt dangerous and everyone can afford. Nuclear power will work for now but hopefully someone will find out how to make everything solar powered and replacee things that pollute and hurt the enviroment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.Henry the 8th</title>
		<link>http://www.bionomicfuel.com/pros-and-cons-of-nuclear-power/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>J.Henry the 8th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-629</guid>
		<description>YA! GOSH! WHATS WITH ALL THIS?!? HOW COME WE CANT FIGURE OUT HOW TO USE SOLAR POWER ON EVERYTHING OR SOMETHING? IF NUCLEAR ENERGY IS SO DANGEROUS WE SHOULD STOP BEING SO LAZY AND WORK SOMETHING ELSE OUT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YA! GOSH! WHATS WITH ALL THIS?!? HOW COME WE CANT FIGURE OUT HOW TO USE SOLAR POWER ON EVERYTHING OR SOMETHING? IF NUCLEAR ENERGY IS SO DANGEROUS WE SHOULD STOP BEING SO LAZY AND WORK SOMETHING ELSE OUT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goerge washington</title>
		<link>http://www.bionomicfuel.com/pros-and-cons-of-nuclear-power/#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>goerge washington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-567</guid>
		<description>you guys are overthinking this stuff why not just use gas? seriousloy, it will last until at least2012</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you guys are overthinking this stuff why not just use gas? seriousloy, it will last until at least2012</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: precaryus</title>
		<link>http://www.bionomicfuel.com/pros-and-cons-of-nuclear-power/#comment-507</link>
		<dc:creator>precaryus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-507</guid>
		<description>You are forgetting the biggest CON of all.
That would be NIMBY = Not in my Back Yard.
Nobody wants a nuke plant anywhere near where they live. That&#039;s why no new plants have been started in the last 2 or 3 decades. The Feds could force the issue but it&#039;s too much trouble. Also, a nuke plant can take 15-20 yrs to build on average. We need to move much faster than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are forgetting the biggest CON of all.<br />
That would be NIMBY = Not in my Back Yard.<br />
Nobody wants a nuke plant anywhere near where they live. That&#8217;s why no new plants have been started in the last 2 or 3 decades. The Feds could force the issue but it&#8217;s too much trouble. Also, a nuke plant can take 15-20 yrs to build on average. We need to move much faster than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.bionomicfuel.com/pros-and-cons-of-nuclear-power/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-484</guid>
		<description>According to the UK&#039;s National Radiological Board, doses from the entire nuclear industry amount to less than 1% of our total exposure... Whats more, compared with known cancer risks such as smoking and poor diet, it reports that the risk from non-medical, man-made radiation is about 1/100th of one percent... In my opinion, people are just troubled by instinctive fears of nuclear energy due to exaggerated reports such as this... And the worry of terrorist threats on nuclear plants... tests have shown that no aircraft can penetrate the concrete cladding of a modern reactor...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the UK&#8217;s National Radiological Board, doses from the entire nuclear industry amount to less than 1% of our total exposure&#8230; Whats more, compared with known cancer risks such as smoking and poor diet, it reports that the risk from non-medical, man-made radiation is about 1/100th of one percent&#8230; In my opinion, people are just troubled by instinctive fears of nuclear energy due to exaggerated reports such as this&#8230; And the worry of terrorist threats on nuclear plants&#8230; tests have shown that no aircraft can penetrate the concrete cladding of a modern reactor&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

